In the subsequent years of post-9/11 America, it is perhaps
too easy to point out that so-called “Islamophobia” that followed was rampant
and fueled by a myriad of inflammatory sources. Amy Waldman’s The Submission takes this simple premise
with a hypothetical scenario, and she runs with it, seamlessly blending
politics, media, and, most importantly, public opinion in an attempt to
illustrate the complexities of race and religious politics.
The city of New York is faced with building a memorial to
the terrorist attack, and it is left to a panel of jurors to decide the winning
design. However, when the final pick is revealed to be Mohammad Khan, the city
is faced with its most vitriolic war of rights since the African American Civil
Rights Movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s. Given the historical context, it
could happen. It is in Waldman’s “show, not tell” approach that takes her first
novel above self-righteous high thought, demonstrating the complexity of every
issue through dynamic character interactions.
It is the characters themselves that make the novel a
compelling read. Each one is uniquely written, as if Waldman brought her
interviewing experience as a reporter in force; each character, however minor,
is his/her own being, which pounds the premise of individuality in the novel
home. Waldman also uses her powerful command of the English language in every
sentence, guiding the reader smoothly through every encounter and every
description.
However, this only works up to a point. As tensions increase
over the course of the novel, Waldman results to using a one-by-one public
account of each potential issue of using Khan’s design. Although it was
probably meant to give the illusion of depth in the fictional trial, it ended
up feeling cheap and contrived. The other large hole was the character Alyssa
Spier, the journalist. The media did play a large shape in public opinion, but
Spier’s presence generally resulted in an article by her that plodded the plot
along if things got slow. Everyone loves a little drama, but it grew tiresome
astoundingly fast.
Even with the occasional stumble, Waldman pulls off a
thought-provoking tale on one of the most controversial topics of the last
decade. The novel flows organically in most cases, with the occasional Spier
appearance to push things along at the speed of plot. Waldman’s first foray
into fiction proves to be a success, even if it is slow at times.
I was with you all the way until the end, but we just must have had different interpretations of the book. Good review, however, and it wraps up nicely at the end. Not too much summary, either.
ReplyDeleteI could also definitely tell that she was coming from a reporting background with the way she described characters. That also made me push back on some of the details though, because it felt like she was running wild with her newfound ability to make up every single detail of someone's life. I thought she went overboard with some of the information.
ReplyDeleteGood review! I like your points about Spier.