To anyone still reading, I'd like to send out my condolences to anyone involved in the bombings today. It is a horrific event, and it warms my heart to see the sheer number of people who have reached out to those in need, whether it be with information or the number of people who physically helped out around the blast sites. Remember to stay informed, as events such as this tend to cause panic and confusion. The best we can do is to offer support to those who need it at this moment, and take in the details as they come. Speculation only breeds further panic.
Major news networks are covering live on television, as well as up-to-date coverage online. At least in the Kalamazoo area, MLive is doing a wonderful job covering the event for Kalamazoo participants, and the Facebook group for check-ins can be found here.
All my love and thoughts to anyone touched by this tragedy,
Jon
Husarts Journalism
It's a blog! On arts. Check back weekly for new posts!
Monday, April 15, 2013
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
New Things!
Hey y'all, so I'm taking another journalism class this quarter that examines the art of narrative journalism specifically. I shall be writing an additional blog for this class which can be found here. If you're interested in reading it, feel free to check it out! It should update roughly weekly. I will be doing my best to continue updating this blog as well, but it will probably be at a much slower pace until around June. Thanks for reading!
Best,
Jon
Best,
Jon
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Process Writing (Just a Short Reflection)
I guess when it comes to the writing of the pieces this quarter, I’m not really sure what to say. For the vast majority of the articles, it was really just a process of viewing the event, taking notes, reading the chapter in the book, and then sitting down and, well, writing. I can say that I especially enjoyed doing both the music event and book reviews, as I love both forms of art. I was pretty neutral on film and theater reviews, and the only one that I did not particularly enjoy was the art exhibit review. Part of it is the fact that I’m really picky about visual art, and the other part was that I quite honestly did not really know much about the technical aspects of it, and the book did not help terribly much. Other than that, it was just a matter of figuring out ordering of information and word choice as I wrote, which I more-or-less did on the fly. I think the most difficult part of writing was figuring out how I should structure the piece.
I have particularly enjoyed the final project. I think the most enjoyable aspect of that was doing the research into it. It allowed me to read a bunch of articles on the subject of sexism in video games in order to both learn new things and to gather information for the article itself. It was just fun to do. The writing itself progressed pretty smoothly, all things considered. I ended up just sort-of rattling the draft off, and once we did the in-class workshopping (which was immensely helpful), it was just a matter of changing things around and normal edits. I don’t necessarily know if I would call it challenging, but it was time consuming. However, it was fun, so it made it seem like not too much work, really. Overall, I would not call the articles difficult, but I would call some challenging, depending on the knowledge base going into it.
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Sorry, Mario, but Your Princess is in Another Castle
At the dawn of video game design,
there was no story; from Pacman to Asteroids to Pong, the burgeoning field of entertainment focused solely
simplistic play and plot. However, as technology and the art form developed,
the need for a plot-driven narrative arose in order to captivate audiences and
to give them incentive to play through their games. The motivation to save a
princess, the so-called “damsel in distress,” became a driving trope, among
others such as hyper-sexualized physical depictions, behind female
representation in video games, creating a lack of strongly written realistic
portrayal of femininity that stretches even to today.
No sexism here! |
Perhaps the most classic and most
recognizable example would be of the Mario
franchise. You have Mario, the burly (if diminutive) plumber, as he ventures
through the mythical Mushroom Kingdom to save the forever imprisoned Princess
Peach. This is the sole motivation that drives the player through almost every
title in the franchise. The same can be said of other titles in the same era.
In the Legend of Zelda franchise, the
player (Link) must battle the forces of evil to save Princess Zelda. Dragon’s Lair (1983) has Dirk the Daring face off against the evil denizens of the evil
wizard Mordroc’s castle and Singe the dragon in order to rescue the Princess
Daphne. In Double Dragon (1987),
fighters Billy and Jimmy crush hordes of generic thugs to find their mutual
love interest, Marian (the epilogue actually pits the two against each other
for her favor). Unfortunately, the trend
continues even to today.
Long has this trope been employed
in stories, even prompting Russian scholar Vladimir Propp to categorize the
“princess or prize” as one of the seven iconic character archetypes in all
storytelling. However, through the turn of the 20th Century to the
modern day, feminist movements to redefine female portrayal in the media have
all but failed, as the trend is only just starting to be broken, especially in
games.
In a 2012 study conducted by
Electric Entertainment Design and Research, referred to as EEDAR, concluded
that in “a sample of 669 games that had protagonists with discernable genders,
only 24 had exclusively female protagonists.” This included games that gave the
player options to choose gender in a character creation. That said, the woman
continues to be the object of desire or weak, as opposed to an empowered
protagonist in a mire of hyper-masculinized leads.
This is generally what happens. |
In Resident Evil 4 (2005), the President’s daughter, Ashley (of course
in sweater and miniskirt), must be saved from the parasite-ridden Ganados. She is largely absent for the
first half of the game, whereas the latter portion is comprised of an extended
escort mission, protecting her from the hordes of enemies as she does little
but hide. The developers of the most recent Tomb
Raider reboot designed the character around the idea that male players
would want to protect her. If the character isn’t created as an object or to
the point of being defenseless, she is
sexualized to the point of absurdity, which brings these unrealistic portrayals
full circle from social to physical issues.
If the female character is not
kidnapped, then she is most likely physically capable, but she may have
Barbie-like proportions or at least a skimpy outfit. The most infamous example
of this, in addition to the probable origin of this trope, is the development
of the Lara Croft from the original Tomb
Raider. In the initial creation of the character, designer Toby Gard desired
to depict a more realistic female body, but accidentally increased the breast
size to 150%, which the rest of the design team argued to keep. This set the
standard for myriads of other female character designs.
Oops. |
Fighting games are quite probably
the worst offenders in this type of sexist portrayal. The Mortal Kombat franchise features characters like Sonya Blade in
short-shorts and a tank top, in addition to many other skimpy outfits that
reveal lithe figures and large busts rather than features that might befit
anyone who routinely has to fist-fight to the death. Soul Calibur is another huge offender, especially in the case of
Ivy, whose breasts are so large, it is hard to think that she could comfortably
walk, let alone fight. Her outfit is another issue entirely. It is difficult to
even call a singlet given how much skin it shows, especially in comparison to
the fully-clothed and sometimes armored men.
Who wouldn't want to fight in that? |
While the depiction of women
historically has been absurd in games, there has been a refreshing trend of
change recently. The Mass Effect trilogy
not only allows for the choice between a male and female protagonist, both are
equal amounts of badass, trouncing aliens and generally being the most
un-killable death machines in the galaxy regardless of gender. It should also
be mentioned that the proportions of Lara Croft in the reboot have been altered
back to a somewhat believable state (it seems like that entire franchise is
bogged down with these issues). Many writers are calling out this entire
travesty in outrage, which is thankfully holding the industry responsible and
putting on the pressure for change.
Now men and women can rock the steely gaze and armor that makes sense. |
While this change is long-coming
and a slow process, a start is a start. Many facets of character design are
mired in this concept of sexist depiction, and so it must be an industry-wide
revolution. Video games, as a medium, are still young, though, so even though
it is necessary that these changes be made, the fact that is starting to occur
quickly in comparison to other media is wonderful. Video game companies are
finally being held accountable for their actions thanks to critics, and so,
while it is only just starting to emerge, hopefully more games will provide a
more realistic approach towards women in their scope. The historic record of
women in video games is atrocious, but up-and-coming titles will have to fight
this trend in order to give women a fighting chance in the traditionally sexist
and patriarchal world of video game narratives and design.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
From Fact to Fiction: "The Submission"
In the subsequent years of post-9/11 America, it is perhaps
too easy to point out that so-called “Islamophobia” that followed was rampant
and fueled by a myriad of inflammatory sources. Amy Waldman’s The Submission takes this simple premise
with a hypothetical scenario, and she runs with it, seamlessly blending
politics, media, and, most importantly, public opinion in an attempt to
illustrate the complexities of race and religious politics.
The city of New York is faced with building a memorial to
the terrorist attack, and it is left to a panel of jurors to decide the winning
design. However, when the final pick is revealed to be Mohammad Khan, the city
is faced with its most vitriolic war of rights since the African American Civil
Rights Movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s. Given the historical context, it
could happen. It is in Waldman’s “show, not tell” approach that takes her first
novel above self-righteous high thought, demonstrating the complexity of every
issue through dynamic character interactions.
It is the characters themselves that make the novel a
compelling read. Each one is uniquely written, as if Waldman brought her
interviewing experience as a reporter in force; each character, however minor,
is his/her own being, which pounds the premise of individuality in the novel
home. Waldman also uses her powerful command of the English language in every
sentence, guiding the reader smoothly through every encounter and every
description.
However, this only works up to a point. As tensions increase
over the course of the novel, Waldman results to using a one-by-one public
account of each potential issue of using Khan’s design. Although it was
probably meant to give the illusion of depth in the fictional trial, it ended
up feeling cheap and contrived. The other large hole was the character Alyssa
Spier, the journalist. The media did play a large shape in public opinion, but
Spier’s presence generally resulted in an article by her that plodded the plot
along if things got slow. Everyone loves a little drama, but it grew tiresome
astoundingly fast.
Even with the occasional stumble, Waldman pulls off a
thought-provoking tale on one of the most controversial topics of the last
decade. The novel flows organically in most cases, with the occasional Spier
appearance to push things along at the speed of plot. Waldman’s first foray
into fiction proves to be a success, even if it is slow at times.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Sexist Portrayals of Women in Video Games
In the larger work that is yet to come, I shall be examining the portrayals of women in video games in the last decade or so. There has been a very outspoken protest against these portrayals within the last two-to-three years, specifically with physical depictions as well as the role that women play in these games.
Included in this will be examinations of a selection of games that have been deemed sexist (soon to come) and a selection that potentially addresses the issues that have been raised (also soon to come). Like television and film, there is a large issue with the presentation of women, but the larger concern is that in video games, developers quite literally have the control to prevent at least the objectification issues in addition to the writing of women in these games.
Sources will include the games themselves, ones that I have played in order to give a fair critique, as well as other critical essays on the topic, news articles, and any digital media that I can include online, both photo and video.
Included in this will be examinations of a selection of games that have been deemed sexist (soon to come) and a selection that potentially addresses the issues that have been raised (also soon to come). Like television and film, there is a large issue with the presentation of women, but the larger concern is that in video games, developers quite literally have the control to prevent at least the objectification issues in addition to the writing of women in these games.
Sources will include the games themselves, ones that I have played in order to give a fair critique, as well as other critical essays on the topic, news articles, and any digital media that I can include online, both photo and video.
Monday, February 25, 2013
The 2013 Academy Awards
The 85th annual Academy Awards proved to be a
night of laughter with more one-liners than meaningful statements. Host Seth
Macfarlane casually strode the line between “somewhat offensive” and “Holy
crap. He actually said that?” throughout the night, from the ode to female
frontal nudity, “We Saw Your Boobs,” to his quip to 9-year-old Quvenzhané Wallis that it would be
“16 years before [she] was too old for George Clooney.”
Minus the awards, the show itself was surreal. William
Shatner (in classic Captain Kirk garb) demeaned Macfarlane from a giant
television screen, Daniel Radcliffe, Macfarlane, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt
performed a song-and-dance number of “High Hopes,” and Jennifer Lawrence fell
up the stairs on the way to her award for Best Leading Actress (she handled it
with much grace).
Besides the absurdity that ran amok throughout the
presentations, it was a huge year for the Oscars. Life of Pi won in four out of the eleven categories it was
nominated for, and in the acting categories there was stiff competition among
the nominees. Daniel Day-Lewis took the Best Leading Actor award for his
stellar performance in Lincoln, while
Jennifer Lawrence (as I mentioned) won Best Leading Actress, edging out Jessica
Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty), Naomi
Watts (The Impossible), Quvenzhané Wallis (Beasts of the Southern Wild), and
Emmanuelle Riva (Amour).
Perhaps the most incredible contest of them all was the
award for Best Film. Among those nominated were Amour, Argo, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Django Unchained, Les Misérables, Life of Pi, Lincoln, and Zero Dark Thirty.
All of the films have been met with critical acclaim, and so the winner was a
toss-up. However, Ben Affleck received his first win since Good Will Hunting in addition to producers Grant Heslov and George
Clooney taking part in the acceptance for Best Film.
The night was also full of musical performances that were
all over the map. Adele’s performance of “Skyfall” (which won Best Original
Song) was poorly mixed, as she was frequently drowned out by the band. On the
other hand, Barbra Streisand’s performance of “The Way We Were” for the
recently deceased Marvin Hamlisch was incredibly touching.
The night also marked the 50th anniversary of the
Bond films, and to celebrate that, they put together a somewhat forgettable
montage of Bond clips with a soundtrack mix, and afterward Shirley Bassey gave
an underwhelming and quite flat performance of “Goldfinger.”
The Oscars had its laughs, and it was certainly
entertaining to watch, but there were few moments during the program that had
any amount of substance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)